https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Association_of_Realto... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Organization_for_Wome... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Association_of_Underw... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Association_for_Bilin... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Association_of_Interc... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Association_of_Black_... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Association_of_Rocket...

Ergo the use of the term 'national' does not automatically indicate intent by the organization to influence the presumption of association with national (regulatory) bodies.

▲

addaon 3 days ago | parent [-]

No, but it conventionally indicates either that, or (a goal of) national presence; for example the National Association of Realtors has members in all fifty states of the (US) nation, not just in one dude's apartment.

▲

handfuloflight 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

NAR also had 117 years to mature.

▲

addaon 3 days ago | parent [-]

And had 120 members across ~15 states on day one, yes.

▲

handfuloflight 3 days ago | parent [-]

In a totally non-fringe, non-dismissed, socially accepted, even legally defined profession.

We don't even today have standardizations to understand what equipment should be used to even record the data that this phenomena generates.

	▲	RajT88 3 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Peculiar right? A well funded agency would likely be able to develop a sensor package which tracks objects with multiple cameras with various zoom lenses and spectrums (IR/UV/etc.) and also radio. I think tech is becoming so good eventually some enterprising UAP engineer is going to be able to cobble something together with off the shelf components and start selling kits. Probably nothing will come of it still, I think, but who knows?
	▲	3 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[deleted]

▲

AStonesThrow 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]