▲ | throwawayexmple 4 days ago | |||||||
'Decentralized Identifiers' centralise identity in the DID. That's tautological. Thus that in itself fails an idea of sovereignty: that choosing to be identified uniquely is your choice. Barking down this alley, while useful from the perspective of NFTs, does not add much to the concept of actual sovereignty. | ||||||||
▲ | AstralStorm 4 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Nah, if you run your own identity service, you're supposed to be able to issue any number of unverified identities yourself. The problem there is that others do not play at all with these, plus actual trust has to be somehow solved. Typical solutions to trust in DID involve either a big central service, a government approved signature... Or theoretically a distributed web of trust but that bit is under development. | ||||||||
|