▲ | ajross 3 days ago | |
Again, though, you're taking "all that gets you" as a prior when (abandoning the metaphor) container and VM escapes are routine vulnerabilities. They just weren't the subject of this particular team who wanted to hack on AI. You don't do security analysis by presuming the absence of vulnerabilities! Modern security is defense in depth. The AI pre-prompting setup was the first layer, and it was escaped. The UID separation inside the container was another, and it was broken. The container would have been next. And hopefully there are network firewalls and egress rules on top of that, etc... And all of those can and have failed in the past. | ||
▲ | tptacek 3 days ago | parent [-] | |
Sure, I guess, but a lot more is broken than Copilot if you assume arbitrary container escape. (I do!) |