▲ | dataflow a day ago | |||||||||||||
> Also, OP's point was that "Physical ownership = real ownership." You don't have "ownership" over something you stole. You have possession of it. Possession != ownership. > The whole point is that that's not the expectation or desire of every single person around you. Not one. Then you're misunderstanding what people are arguing. People want the owner to be the ultimate authority. The owner gets to encrypt what they like, expose what they like, track what they like, trust megacorp they like, etc. And if a thief steals the device, they get whatever they get as a result of the owner's decisions. Which could be all their data, or a visit from the local police, depending on how the owner prepared for it. | ||||||||||||||
▲ | motorest a day ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||
> You don't have "ownership" over something you stole. You have possession of it. Possession != ownership. You need to develop your functional literacy skills because you clearly are failing to even understand the topics being discussed, let alone the arguments going either way. | ||||||||||||||
|