> Fundamentally none of the issues inherent in LLMs will be fixed by increasing parameter count or better weights.

Um, ok just disregard my entire post where I talk about how my issues with using LLMs for programming were literally solved by better models.

They weren't. And if you think they were, you're simply wrong.

Sorry but it is what it is.

	▲	whynotminot 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		Do you get very far at work with contrarian takes backed up without evidence or detail? How does dismissing other people’s experience so condescendingly work out for you in real life? I’m curious if/how you’ve built a career this way. Or is this account just a stress relief “shit-posting” persona?