▲ | lazide 5 days ago | |||||||
By the time a man has hit his 40’s, it is exceptionally uncommon he hasn’t seen someone hit with a false rape claim - or had one himself - by a vindictive ex. Or has been threatened with (or directly attacked) with physical violence. By people going on the same sort of rants like you just did. Some People are terrible, especially when they think they can act without consequences. Does that excuse men doing bad things too? No. But it sure does (or should!) make anyone with a brain question hyperbolic claims of abuse or violence without actual evidence. | ||||||||
▲ | 9dev 5 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
The problem is that you're equating the wide range of violence against women with a specific kind of violence against men by calling both "bad things", insinuating those are even remotely comparable. They are not. 90% of rape victims are female. In the US alone, every 68 seconds, a woman is sexually assaulted. After the big war, some Germans were quick to point out that their people had suffered when they were displaced from the land they occupied in Poland, for example, and that "both sides had suffered". I assume you're also incapable of understanding why the victims of the Nazi regime were completely aghast by that? > But it sure does (or should!) make anyone with a brain question hyperbolic claims of abuse or violence without actual evidence. What do you suggest to do instead? Sexual violence is often a crime with only the perpetrator(s) and the victim as witnesses. In most cases, rape doesn't leave persistent traces. Rape victims tend to be in shock, however, and often need time to process what happened. Your suggestion seems to be that we should question these claims? Judging these cases correctly is incredibly complicated, and claims of wide swaths of men falling prey to abusive women don't really help anyone affected. | ||||||||
|