I didn't mention "porn", and there's a reason I included domestic violence simulations in list of specific things they're targeting; when phrased like that it sounds like a reasonable category to ban. I haven't played that specific game but it certainly sounds close enough that it could be caught even if not intended (and maybe it is intended - even if I trust what people say on the internet and the game is well-meaning, that doesn't mean it is actually healthy or sane).

If it really is an example of a rare false positive, a manual fix for that one specific game is a reasonable thing to seek, without giving the pedos their heyday like most of the comments here suggest.

You might disagree with me and others here and even want censorship for games. But don't you think it's should be regulated by your local government for your specific country or by whatever regulator there is where you live?

Do you really think Visa and MasterCard should be making decisions what is acceptable for like everyone?

Otherwise any random weirdos from UK or Australia will censor what are you allowed to watch or play in the US.

And China can also put pretty good pressure on payment processors too. They'll certainly want many games gone since they are worse than pedos for CCP.