▲ | dahart a day ago | |||||||
Do you really need a paper? It’s well known that looking at the sun does damage to rods and cones, because it far exceeds their response range, long before perception gets involved. | ||||||||
▲ | mystraline a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
'In the sun' != 'at the sun' And you completely miss what I'm asking too. Chemical reactions in the rods and cones are only a small portion of vision processing. The rest is in the brain, with a great deal of various processing happening, that eventually comes to cognition and understanding what you see. And parts of the visual cognition system also synthesize and hallucinate vision systems as well, like the vision hole where the optic nerve meets the eye. But cognitively, the data is there smeared across time and space (as in a SLAM algo putting the data where it should go, not what is measured). | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | NewsaHackO a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Woah, the sun is bright? How do you know this is true for everyone? Do you have a peer reviewed RCT paper posted in a high impact journal confirming this? |