▲ | johnmaguire a day ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> So sad that we traded fast lenses and film for color. I am not sure the quality ever quite caught up again to the better B&W until we get to modern digital. Can you explain why color film would be a tradeoff against fast lenses? Can't you use the exact same lens with color or B&W? Or what you mean by "traded film for color"? After all, color film existed decades before digital. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | JKCalhoun a day ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Maybe someone else knows why black and white film looks sharper and has more detail then. Was there a race to the bottom in terms of optics when color film showed up in the consumer camera? Is it because they moved to a smaller film stock than the medium format 120 film that was common in B&W cameras before color? Or is color film, with three layers of gelatin, an inherently "noisier" film stock? I don't know. I only observe the quality fall off when color arrives. Worse, I am not even sure. that my mom's 35mm camera (Canon AE-1) in the 70's shot as good and crisp photos as the B&W cameras in the family in the 40's (before she was born though). | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | brudgers 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
[I am not agreeing with the grandparent comment] Color film typically benefits from optical coatings on the lenses and coated lenses are common from about 1950 onward and uncommon before WWII. |