The article lacks some examples of what "done right" means. It points to some videogames that "do it terribly" (they look ok to me? not photorealistic, but not every videogame has to be like that?) but it does not show how "a correct" version of each image would be. Just says "it looks obviously bad". Sorry but I don't see it. I'm fine with videogames looking videogamey.

▲

armonster a day ago | parent [-]

The article shows 5 images from games showing it done poorly, and 4 images from games showing it done well.

A fifth image of it done well was added in an edit.

	▲	otikik a day ago \| parent [-]
		It doesn’t matter if the images are different. To the author it might be super obvious why some are good and others aren’t. To me they all look good.