▲ | awongh 5 days ago | |||||||
This is great, but as others have mentioned the UX problem is more complicated than this: - for other models there are providers that serve the same model with different prices - each provider optimizes for different parameters: speed, cost, etc. - the same model can still be different quantizations - some providers offer batch pricing (e.g., Grok API does not) And there are plenty of other parameters to filter over- thinking vs. non-thinking, multi-modal or not, etc. not to even mention benchmarks ranking. https://artificialanalysis.ai gives a blended cost number which helps with sorting a bit, but a blended cost model for input/output costs are going to change depending on what you're doing. I'm still holding my breath for a site that has a really nice comparison UI. Someone please build it! | ||||||||
▲ | numlocked 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
(I work at OpenRouter) We have a simple model comparison tool that is not-at-all-obvious to find on the website, but hopefully can help somewhat. E.g. https://openrouter.ai/compare/qwen/qwen3-coder/moonshotai/ki... | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | zeroCalories 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I think it would be very hard to make a fair comparison. Best you could do is probably make the trade-offs clear and let people make their own choices. I think it could be cool to make something like a token exchange where people put up their requirements, and then companies offer competing services that fit those requirements. Would be cool to let random people offer to their compute, but you would need to find a way to handle people lying about their capabilities or stealing data. | ||||||||
▲ | alexellman 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
would a column for "provider" meaning the place you are actually making the call to solve this | ||||||||
▲ | svachalek 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Please not benchmark ranking. We've encouraged this nonsense far too long already. |