| ▲ | nabla9 2 days ago |
| I can read what you wrote. You said that the evaluation duplicate something. Only thing they duplicate was the possibility of key firing. You must be referring to that. They were not able to duplicate physical malfunction. |
|
| ▲ | lazide 2 days ago | parent [-] |
| They absolutely were able to duplicate elements of physical malfunction. |
| |
| ▲ | nabla9 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Yes. "elements" of physical malfunction, not the malfunction. That means they were able to individual safety mechanism fail, but not all of them. The intact gun would not fire all by itself if it was hammered in the test. | | |
| ▲ | lazide 2 days ago | parent [-] | | And yet, it did in reality. And there were clear manufacturing defects found when looking at the gun. | | |
| ▲ | nabla9 2 days ago | parent [-] | | You started with "the FBI was able to duplicate the ‘spontaneous firing of a chambere" And we end with perfect social media claim: "I believe it did happen in reality". I rest my case. | | |
|
|
|
