▲ | _n_b_ 2 days ago | |||||||
As a nuclear engineer, it's hard to use these kinds of intro tools without shouting things at your monitor. For this, it was the omission of xenon when discussing simulating reactor transients. I get that it's meant to be overly simplified, and it's a neat idea that is probably helpful for communicating some key concepts. | ||||||||
▲ | ofrzeta 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
then give us better tools! :) Most of the sims require (at least?) registration with the IAEA: https://www.iaea.org/topics/nuclear-power-reactors/nuclear-r... (I want that Micro-Physics Nuclear Reactor Simulator) Then there's this https://dalton-nrs.manchester.ac.uk/ but it's down for "maintenance" (a web site - can you imagine?!) I found this interesting https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59hVaIjxMIM but people say it does no longer work on recent Windows version. Also I don't like to install random binaries from Mega or similar. In the end a realistic reactor simulation would probably to complicated for the layman, anyway. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | ethan_smith 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Xenon-135's huge neutron absorption cross-section and its buildup/decay dynamics create the "xenon poisoning" effect that makes power changes tricky and can even prevent reactor restart after shutdown - a critical aspect of real reactor operation. | ||||||||
▲ | mnw21cam 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
FWIW, Xenon was discussed, but it didn't go into enough detail about why Xenon matters and how it can create transients. | ||||||||
|