Agree. I stopped reading after the blurb below because it tells me this person has not actually even used Copilot or Cursor to a serious degree. This is an AI-written sentence that seems fine, but is actually complete nonsense.

> Each tool has carved out its own niche in the development workflow: Copilot excels at enhancing your typing speed with intelligent code completion, Cursor at debugging and helping you implement discrete tasks well, and recently pushing more into agentic territory.

Cursor's autocomplete blows Copilot's out of the water. And both Copilot and Cursor have pretty capable agents. Plus, Claude Code isn't even mentioned here.

This blog post is a Kiro advertisement, not a serious comparative analysis.