| ▲ | gbrindisi 2 days ago |
| meta: if you use AI to write articles, don’t have them written so that I’m forced to use AI to summarize them |
|
| ▲ | conartist6 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Reading the HN comments instead of the article is the best summarizing hack |
| |
| ▲ | djeastm 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I kind of hate the implications of it, but if HN (or someone else) wanted to add value, they could show one-line sentiment analyses of the comments in the HN articles so you can decide what's what without even clicking. | | |
| ▲ | conartist6 2 days ago | parent [-] | | The reason reading comments is so useful is because it's not one summary but a variety of different, unique reactions (and reactions to reactions). The model I want to train is ME, so a one sentence sentiment analysis offers 0 value to me while a lot of distinct human perspectives are a gold mine. It's kinda like the difference between being able to look at a single picture of a landscape and being able to walk around it. |
| |
| ▲ | Cthulhu_ 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Ironically there was a tool just the other day that would read HN articles and summarize them. |
|
|
| ▲ | amarcheschi 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Ai decompressor doing their best again. Seriously, though, the article feels too long imho |
|
| ▲ | iamsaitam 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Better, it should be compulsory for these to lead with a summarized version |
