| ▲ | ipnon 2 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
Tao’s commentary is more practical and insightful than all of the “rationalist” doomers put together. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jmmcd 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
(a) no it's not (b) your comment is miles off-topic, as he is not addressing doom in any sense | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Quekid5 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
That seems like a low bar :) | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ks2048 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I agree about Tao in general, but here, > AI technology is now rapidly approaching the point of transition from qualitative to quantitative achievement. I don't get it. The whole history of deep learning was driven by quantitative achievement on benchmarks. I guess the rest of the post is about adding emphasis on costs in addition to overall performance. But, I don't see how that is a shift from qualitative to quantitative. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||