▲ | maerch 2 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> A repeated trend is that Claude Code only gets 70-80% of the way, which is fine and something I wish was emphasized more by people pushing agents. Recently, I realized that this applies not only to the first 70–80% of a project but sometimes also to the final 70-80%. I couldn’t make progress with Claude on a major refactoring from scratch, so I started implementing it myself. Once I had shaped the idea clearly enough but in a very early state, I handed it back to Claude to finish and it worked flawlessly, down to the last CHANGELOG entry, without any further input from me. I saw this as a form of extensive guardrails or prompting-by-example. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | golergka 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
That’s why I like using it and get more fulfilment from coding than before: I do the fun parts. AI does the mundane. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | bavell 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I need to try this - started using Claude code a few days ago and have been struggling to get good implementations with some high-complexity refactors. It keeps over engineering and creating more problems than it solves. It's getting close though, and I think your approach would work very well for this scenario! | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|