Remix.run Logo
ricciardo 2 days ago

That is a pretty interesting observation. I always thought it was solely on the amount of calories consumed vs burned. For example, you burn ~2500 through just living, if you eat a pizza that contains 3000 calories, no matter the time at which you eat it, will you not still gain fat?

schmidtleonard 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Calorie counting works, but "use this one weird trick to target belly fat and achieve six pack" sells books.

mecsred 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Its all anecdotal all the way down, so here's another grain of salt to add to the pile.

(Calories in - calories out) is correct enough to be the single most reliable metric, and will serve you right 99% of the time. My "one level deeper" understanding is that there are a few transfer functions applied to calories in. So of the technically available calories you eat, how much does your body absorb. Then, when the calories are biologically available, how does your body spend them?

So the idea would be, if you eat the pizza at the right time you reduce calories in. Either you will digest less calories, or your body will allocated them differently at different times of the day.

Unfortunately these things aren't really measurable so it's very hard to separate from hearsay.

stonemetal12 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

>solely on the amount of calories consumed vs burned.

It is, but CI\CO as advice doesn't take in to account that you aren't a machine and we aren't calculating gas mileage. The system is both adaptive and reactive. CI and CO changes based on the situation, and you have no way to accurately measure.

SketchySeaBeast 2 days ago | parent [-]

That's why you don't worry about Calories Out. You measure Calories In daily and then your weight at a sample rate that's long enough that it averages out most weirdness - probably weekly. If your weight is going up, reduce caloric consumption.