They won't be obvious. They'll be highly customized brain worms influencing your votes and purchases to the highest bidder.

▲

A4ET8a8uTh0_v2 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Yep. Right now, even with cookies inferences about individual humans are minimal, but exposing your whole patterns in speech make you a ripe target for manipulation at a scale that some may not fully understand yet. 4o is very adept at cold reading and it is genuinely fascinating to read those from that perspective alone. Combine it with style evaluation and a form of rudimentary history analysis, and you end up with actual dossier on everyone using that service.

Right now, we are lucky, because it is the least altered version of it ( and we all know how many filters public models have to go through ).

▲

lopis 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Which sounds very illegal in most places, as clearly identifying sponsored content is required. Let's see how that turns out.

	▲	floatrock 2 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> as clearly identifying sponsored content is required Citation needed? Once AI content becomes monetized with ads, it's not going to look like the ads/banners we're used to. If you're looking into the past, you don't understand the potential of AI. Noam Chomsky's manufactured consent is going to look quaint by comparison.
	▲	_DeadFred_ 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		For hire drivers/having employees had very specific legal requirements in most areas. Let's see how that turned out. Oh yeah, the dystopian tech companies won and we the people got the benefit job/job rules being thrown out for the beauty that is independent contractor 'gig work'.