I'm not sure what you're arguing here.

Bigger battery is more capacity sure. But their point was that even without a big battery they have enough capacity to get close to maximum effectiveness, contrary to ajross saying that a hybrid's capacity is "not really" effective and "at best" helps "some".

▲

CraigJPerry 2 days ago | parent [-]

just mistaken about maximum effectiveness

braking system = circa 1G of deceleration possible (depending on tyres, coeff of friction, temperature, ... etc etc)

So max effectiveness is unreachable for any regen system on a consumer car hybrid or ev, by a factor of around 6x i believe?

With recognition of the mistaken framing (near max effectiveness) we're back to the larger ev pack has a greater ability to sink current, a larger ability to slow the vehicle than does a smaller battery (obvious considerations about inverter capability, wire gauge etc etc aside)

	▲	Dylan16807 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		I think you might be using a very different definition of "effectiveness" than they are. Their definition of effectiveness is the percentage of braking force that turns back into electricity and goes into the battery. If your regen system can only do .15G, but 90% of your braking is under .15G, then you'll have about 94% effectiveness by that definition. 94% is not max but it's near max. It's not about what happens during peak braking, it's about what happens over entire drives. And when they say "half or so of how fast I could stop" they're underestimating, that's a comparison to a normal but aggressive stop, not pushing the pedal into the ground.