▲ | jnpnj 2 days ago | |||||||
I heard about that long ago but couldn't find more, so IIUC chemically it's easier and more efficient to have a "one mode" combustion engine and let the electric engine deal with the variations, to the point that the reaction produces near no toxic byproducts, is that right ? I was wondering if there was research to keep improving that part. Even though it would help sustain the fossil fuel industry.. | ||||||||
▲ | Asmod4n 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Nissan hat the e-POWER system where a petrol engine is just used to recharge the battery of your electric car and nothing else. In theory they could run that petrol engine at the sweet spot where it produces the least amount of carbon emissions. i believe there is also a chinese company which is making such a car, their cars have nearly 1000 miles range. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | p0w3n3d 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
AFAIK this is about engine efficiency. ICEs have highest momentum and efficiency sweet spot somewhere in the middle of available revs, which depends on the engine construction and was being altered by different mechanisms (like turbocharging and variable valve timing) but since the electric engine (I'm speaking of Toyota solution) is able to keep the ICE in the sweet spot with its eCVT, the engine can be simplified and even work on different combustion cycle (Atkinson's cycle) | ||||||||
|