Nobody disputes this. Weakly posits a bright line between agents suggesting active steps and agents actually performing active steps. The problem is that during incident investigations, some active steps make a lot of sense for agents to perform, and others don't; the line isn't where she seems to claim it is.

Understood. To your example about the logs, my concern would be be that the AI chooses the wrong thing to focus on and people decide there’s nothing of interest in the logs, thus overlooking a vital clue.