> That is assuming that it is really a force multiplier which is not totally evident at this point.

I really think that this is a lack of imagination at this point for people who actually think this way.

There are two easy wins for almost anyone:

1. Optional tasks that add value but never reach the top of the priority list.

2. Writing routine communication and documentation.

> Anything that is realistically a force multiplier is a person divider. At that point I would expect people to resist it.

The CEOs who are using AI as an excuse to reduce head count are not helping this narrative.

AI will not solve their problems for large staff cuts. It’s just an unrelated excuse to walk back from over hiring in the past (esp. during Covid).

That said, I think that framing AI as a “person divider” is baseless fear-mongering for most job categories.