> Type "pocket alternative" into your favorite search engine and you'll find a bunch of sites that recommend a few good alternatives.

Now our turn to call bs. There is no single result at the first few pages of your "favorite search engine" results that would give you a comprehensive comparison to Pocket, so you'll have to waste time with a few services to uncover how they fail at something basic Pocket has.

And all these "alternatives" lists you cite are very primitive that won't help you uncover such issues

> mostly because my pocket list is pretty much dump and forget

Ok, but you know that some people actually want to use the service to, you know, read later instead of forgetting?