Remix.run Logo
amelius a day ago

If AI can trade stocks and derivatives better than any humans, maybe we'll see wealth accumulation in a few large AI firms. And the stock market becomes effectively useless to the rest of us.

mu53 a day ago | parent | next [-]

What AI? ML with gradient descent? Neural nets with deep learning? LLMs? Or the abstract concept of AGI that may or may not possible, but definitely isn't here yet?

Hedge funds and investment banks are already using these tools to the max, and the markets are plenty profitable for everyone

simantel a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

RenTec did this successfully, but their strategies didn't scale up beyond ~$30B AUM before they started moving their markets too much (with the Medallion Fund).

__MatrixMan__ a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It would be a reductio ad absurdum for the stock market which is long overdue.

im3w1l a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think what will happen is that ordinary people will invest in a mutual fund managed by AI and/or the funds people already invest in will start adopting AI-tooling.

I think this scenario is plausible because the path to this scenario is so smooth so it will be the default outcome unless something strange happens to prevent it.

SketchySeaBeast a day ago | parent [-]

I'm wondering what a market looks like where everyone is running an AI that makes the optimal purchases. The market needs bag holders.

I also don't know that it would change my behaviour. If my goal is long term investment success what's the downside of my continuing to invest in broad market funds? I don't need an AI making split second decisions if my investment horizon is still 30 years.

im3w1l a day ago | parent [-]

Wild guess, but I think trading activity goes down. AI focuses instead on which equity issuances to participate in.

kjkjadksj a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They already use models for trading better than any human and have probably done so since the 1950s. And what do you know, wealth accumulation has been significant over the last 70 years.

amelius a day ago | parent [-]

Yeah but wealth accumulation can only go so far, because at some point people will start to question the validity of the entire market.

snoman a day ago | parent [-]

With index funds effectively propping up the S&P etc. people are already questioning it.

Consider that millions of people are parking billions of dollars in index funds that just track the ~500 biggest companies with the expectation they’ll all just get bigger.

kjkjadksj 11 hours ago | parent [-]

Every paycheck people buy more into it via their 401k

k-i-r-t-h-i a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

trading =/= investing

amelius a day ago | parent [-]

investing == long term trading

rickydroll a day ago | parent [-]

investing == (rent seeking || criminal activity) && regulatory failures

alephnerd a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You do realize that all the math used in AI/ML has been heavily used in Finance for decades right?

Everything is Applied Math if you squint hard enough.

All this AI/ML doomerism and boosterism is ridiculous. If you do not understand how gradient descent works or why as of today GPUs are better suited for model training compared to CPUs you should not have a say in this discussion.

Most conversations around AI/ML appear to basically be pop-philosophy discussions that aren't even that grounded in philosophy fundamentals.

If you have trash fundamentals, you will have a trash understanding of the world.

mindwok a day ago | parent [-]

You can make this point without needing to insult everyone’s intelligence and gate-keep discussions about AI.

lofaszvanitt a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah, but AI will be banned before that happens.

dzink a day ago | parent | next [-]

Not if the lobbying budget of those making the AI money is larger than those that lose money to AI in the market.

razemio a day ago | parent | prev [-]

How would you ban AI? It is unstoppable now.

lofaszvanitt a day ago | parent [-]

We'll see