why do you think it's poor drafting? there's a clear cross-country campaign by the American right that's seized control of many states and the federal government to end free speech as a concept by creating laws and regulations and policies like this, so that favoured groups can do whatever, and anyone who finds themselves disfavoured will be in violation of stuff like this.

I think the article answers this pretty well. The bill has text about not being construed as restricting any first amendment rights while simultaneously banning all 1A activity within certain hours. That just seems like a really stupid contradiction, and one that's likely to rile people up, compared to a drafting which just says "here are a list of protest activities which are allowed in the day and banned at night", which I feel was the intent of the bill.

[flagged]