▲ | markburns a day ago | |||||||||||||
I had a realisation recently that we’re pretty comfortable with regional dialect borders being an entrenched and normal thing that reach back in history a thousand years or more and that something as specific as how we move our mouths and tongues is strongly correlated geographically. But we don’t often pay attention to other types of physical and behavioural culture being as geographically entrenched as they sometimes seem to be. Accents hold some special place in being so recognisable but I think there’s no obvious reason we wouldn’t have many other layers of physical culture like this. The signal is a bit harder to pick up but I’m sure it’s there. I’m not trying to make any particular point for or against damaging stereotypes here. | ||||||||||||||
▲ | degamad 18 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||
There are some behaviours which are classically regionally identified, but they tend to be the exception to the rule... Italians talking with their hands, the Indian head-wobble, the East-Asian squat, etc. | ||||||||||||||
|