It looks like they are deciding how to approach this. The article you’re commenting on is about how they identified malicious behavior and then blocked that behavior.

It seems odd to pitch suggestions for other things they ought to do but then couch it with “well I’m not being serious” in a way that deflects all actual discussion of the logistics of your suggestion.

Yeah, so I've read. Good for them, I suppose.

> in a way that deflects all actual discussion of the logistics of your suggestion

You seem to be mistaken there: I very much welcome a discussion on it. Keyword being "discussion". Just let's not expect an outcome anything more serious than "wow I sure came up with something pretty silly / vaguely interesting". Or put forward framings like "I'm telling them what to do or what not to do".