I've had Claude 3.5, Grok 3, and DeepSeek claim that it was made by OpenAI.

codedokode a day ago | parent | next [-]

> However, OpenAI has publicly acknowledged ongoing investigations as to whether DeepSeek “inappropriately distilled” their models to produce an AI chatbot at a fraction of the price.

I wonder does OpenAI has permission from all authors of works it "inappropriately distilled"? A pirate has no right to complain about safety of navigation.

I think there should be a system that if country A illegally uses works of country B for developing an AI, it loses copyright protection in country B.

	▲	nomel 12 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> I wonder does OpenAI has permission from all authors of works it "inappropriately distilled"? The rulings are leaning towards it being transformative enough to be fair use, so permission may not be required [1]. We'll have to see how it goes with Disney vs Midjourney. > I think there should be a system that if country A illegally uses works of country B for developing an AI, it loses copyright protection in country B. This would be pointless with China, since it's already how they operate, as continuously reported by the WTO. But, I see your point. [1] https://www.whitecase.com/insight-alert/two-california-distr...

▲

whimsicalism a day ago | parent | prev [-]

This is maybe how DS did v3, but certainly not the big technical leap to r1.