You seem to be lost. While referencing a TV show may or may not be a rebuttal to a very specific kind of worldview, it is out of place as a response to my post to which you've failed to actually directly reference at all.

I'm addressing this point at you personally because we can all see your comments: being nasty to atheists on the internet will never be a substitute for hard evidence for your ideology.

▲

tsunamifury 12 hours ago | parent [-]

you seem to be profoundly confused Adam Curtis is a leading thinker in documentarian of our time and widely recognized in continental philosophy. The fact that you tried to dismiss him as a TV show shows you seem to be completely naïve about the topic you’re speaking about.

Second, I’m not being nasty to atheists and speaking specifically about not having false gods which if anything is a somewhat atheistic perspective

Honestly, what are you trying to say?

▲

evantbyrne 11 hours ago | parent [-]

Like I said, we can all read your comments. Needs no further elaboration. If I receive a second recommendation for Curtis then I might be inclined to check it out. Take it easy.

	▲	tsunamifury 8 hours ago \| parent [-]
		This is such a baffling and bizarre response.