▲ | librasteve 15 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I stand corrected on that - I was responding to the headline and did not appreciate that Rust has had library support beforehand. (That said, having regex around in different standard vs. crate options is not necessarily the ideal). It's good to have a focus and I agree that Rust is all about performance and stability for a system language. I haven't seen Raku regex performance benchmarked, but I would be surprised if it beats perl or Rust. I wouldn't say that Raku is a good choice where speed is the most important consideration since it is a scripting language that runs on a VM with GC. Nevertheless the language syntax includes many features (hyper operators, lazy evaluation to name two) that make it amenable to performance optimisation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | masklinn 15 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> That said, having regex around in different standard vs. crate options is not necessarily the ideal What 1: both regex and fancy-regex are crates. Regex is under the rust-lang umbrella but it’s not part of the stdlib. What 2: having different options is the point of third partly libraries, why would you have a third party library which is the exact same thing as the standard library? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|