▲ | dunefox 18 hours ago | |||||||
A Lovecraft reference, nice. I'm wondering whether a smaller model would suffice as well. | ||||||||
▲ | zkms 17 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/shoggoth-with-smiley-face-art... https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/30/technology/shoggoth-meme-... | ||||||||
▲ | troyvit 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Yeah I came here to say the same thing. It seems like it would simplify things. They do say: "I initially considered training a single end-to-end VLA model. [...] A cable-driven soft robot is different: the same tip position can correspond to many cable length combinations. This unpredictability makes demonstration-based approaches difficult to scale.[...] Instead, I went with a cascaded design: specialized vision feeding lightweight controllers, leaving room to expand into more advanced learned behaviors later." I still think circling back to smaller models would be awesome. With some upgrades you might get a locally hosted model on there, but I'd be sure to keep that inside a pentagram so it doesn't summon a Great One. | ||||||||
|