| ▲ | evilfred 10 hours ago |
| how is it "trusted" when it just makes things up |
|
| ▲ | andrewflnr 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| That's a great question to ask the people who seem to trust them implicitly. |
| |
| ▲ | handfuloflight 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | They aren't trusted in a vacuum. They're trusted when grounded in sources and their claims can be traced to sources. And more specifically, they're trusted to accurately represent the sources. | | |
| ▲ | andrewflnr 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Nope, lots of idiots just take them at face value. You're still describing what rational people do, not what all actual people do. | | | |
| ▲ | PebblesRox 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If you believe this, people believe everything they read by default and have to apply a critical thinking filter on top of it to not believe the thing. I know I don't have as much of a filter as I ought to! https://www.lesswrong.com/s/pmHZDpak4NeRLLLCw/p/TiDGXt3WrQwt... | | |
| ▲ | andrewflnr 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | That checks out with my experience. I don't think it's just reading either. Even deeper than stranger danger, we're inclined to assume other humans communicating with us are part of our tribe, on our side, and not trying to deceive us. Deception, and our defenses against deception, are a secondary phenomenon. It's the same reason that jokes like "the word 'gullible' is written in the ceiling", gesturing to wipe your face at someone with a clean face, etc, all work by default. |
| |
| ▲ | sheiyei 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > they're trusted to accurately represent the sources. Which is still too much trust |
|
|
|
| ▲ | tsukikage 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| “trusted” in computer science does not mean what it means in ordinary speech. It is what you call things you have no choice but to trust, regardless of whether that trust is deserved or not. |
| |
| ▲ | pegasus 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | For one, it's not like we're at some CS conference, so we're engaging in ordinary speech here, as far as I can tell. For two, "trusted" doesn't have just one meaning, even in the narrower context of CS. | |
| ▲ | lxgr 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I meant it in the ordinary speech sense (which I don't even thing contradicts the "CS sense" fwiw). Many people have a lot of trust in anything ChatGPT tells them. |
|
|
| ▲ | dingnuts 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| 15% of people aren't smart enough to read and follow directions explaining how to fold a trifold brochure, place it in an envelope, seal it, and address it you think those people don't believe the magic computer when it talks? |
