Remix.run Logo
JimmaDaRustla 11 hours ago

> I can't find a single open source codebase, actively used in production, and primarily maintained and developed with AI.

As I stated, you haven't been paying attention.

mcherm 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

A better-faith response would be to point out an example of such an open source codebase OR tell why that specific set of restrictions (open-source, active production, primarily AI) is unrealistic.

For instance, one might point out that the tools for really GOOD AI code authoring have only been available for about 6 months so it is unreasonable to expect that a new project built primarily using such tools has already reached the level of maturity to be relied on in production.

JimmaDaRustla 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I don't have time to handhold the ignorant.

I do however have time to put forth my arguments now that I use LLMs to make my job easier - if it weren't for them, I wouldn't be here right now.

dminik 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

One would think that with all of the time AI is clearly saving you, you could spare some of it for us uneducated peasants.

eddythompson80 2 hours ago | parent [-]

They are clearly busy dunking on us all.

eddythompson80 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You don’t have time to post a link with an example. You have time to post a wall of text instead.

JimmaDaRustla 11 hours ago | parent [-]

My code isn't open source.

eddythompson80 11 hours ago | parent [-]

Checkmate

JimmaDaRustla 11 hours ago | parent [-]

You didn't checkmate anything.

You're perfectly capable of looking at the world around you. You're arguing in bad faith using a false dichotomy that I must be able to produce examples or my argument is not valid. You're trying to suck all the air out of the room and waste time.

https://tools.simonwillison.net/

ChECk MaTee

slacktivism123 11 hours ago | parent [-]

Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Aside from that, I don't see how the collection of simple one-shot JavaScript wrappers (like "Extract URLs", "Word Counter", and "Pomodoro Timer") that you keep bringing up is related to your argument.

eddythompson80 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

“you haven’t been listening. It’s inevitable to happen”

mashygpig 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I don’t find it fair that you point out straw man in your parent comment and then use ad hominem in this comment. I would love to see you post some examples. I think you’d have a chance of persuading several readers to at least be more open minded.

hinkley 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> But despite extensive searching myself and after asking many proponents

11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
nkrisc 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

So… which ones?

JimmaDaRustla 11 hours ago | parent [-]

Mine, it's how I have time to argue with the denialists right now.

eddythompson80 11 hours ago | parent [-]

Nice sales pitch.

belter 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

At least we know you are human, since you are gaslighting us instead of citing a random link, that leads to a 404 page. An LLM would have confidently hallucinated a broken reference by now.

Cthulhu_ 11 hours ago | parent [-]

Not necessarily, one aspect of the LLM arms race is to have the most up-to-date records or to use a search engine to find stuff.

jdiff 10 hours ago | parent [-]

If the LLM thinks to consult a search engine. If the next token predicted is the start of a link rather than the start of a tool call, it's going to be spitting out a link. Getting them to reliably use tools rather than freeball seems to be quite a difficult problem to solve.