People tend to be annoyed by things they interact with frequently.

I get annoyed by web development, but I wouldn't want to see the solution be a federally mandated burning to the ground of the HTML standard.

▲

terminalshort 12 hours ago | parent [-]

Would you like to see a HTML standard imposed by law and that takes years and billions of dollars to amend? I don't think you would like that either. If I had to choose between the two, I'll take the wild west no standard option.

	▲	shadowgovt 8 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You're asking me if I, as a full-time web developer, would like to see an HTML standard that is incredibly expensive to modify? A standard that could be relied upon to be bedrock atop which you could build frameworks and polyfill to bridge any arbitrary issue you may encounter between the underlying interface and the developer's interface, for years if not decades? A concrete, unyielding standard the browser implementers could forever optimize towards, confident their optimizations won't run afoul of a change to the standard coming down the pipe, or an entirely new feature in the standard that demands novel support at the cost of breaking abstractions that supported the existing standard? ... is there, like, a change.org petition I can sign in favor of this? ;)