▲ | HPsquared 20 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Just remember that machines already do most of the work. Nobody ploughs fields anymore. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | mlsu 19 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes, of course. What is AI freeing us of? Communicating with other human beings? Ah what a chore. Other human beings. Wish I could just enter into a cocoon of solitude for the rest of my life. I mean I'm kind of being glib here but the ~amazing future~ we all seem to take as inevitable has me playing solo orchestra conductor, prompt pupettering a massive fleet of hyper intelligent code bots, prompting an AI to make prompts for its sub AIs in a giant scintillating cyberprism. Talking to an AI customer service agent. Having an AI secretary. Having an AI lover. All alone, in the middle of it all. Sorry, I actually like talking to my real human colleagues! | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | dilawar 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Those machines unlocked more work, different work, that led to better paying jobs! I am all up for AI if it leads to "better" work and jobs but cutting jobs to cut cost sound like a race to bottom!! Are AI time /cost savings going to help me pursue creative hobbies, open source, help my community without worrying about livelihood then great. If it is a means to make rich people richer by making most of us worse off, maybe we should stop and think for a while? There may be a risk here that a zero/negative-sum game is advertised as a positive-sum game (e.g war). | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | phyzome 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
What a fascinatingly out-of-touch comment. |