▲ | kelseyfrog 16 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
If Chesterton's fence doesn't have a working latch, then it's appropriate to remove it entirely. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | sorcerer-mar 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
We know for a fact (like actual empirical fact) that FDA prevents vast numbers of unsafe and ineffective drugs from reaching the market. This is absolutely indisputable. So uhhh, maybe we think in reality instead of offloading to metaphor. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | wizzwizz4 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
If Chesterton's fence is intangible and invisible, then it's appropriate to remove it entirely. If it doesn't have a working latch, it doesn't serve as a hard barrier, but it may still serve as a soft barrier, and that may be good enough. Or, conversely, important things may have been relying on access via the latch-free fence gate: fixing the latch without providing a more appropriate solution to those issues could cause more harm than the benefit you get from "now the fence actually functions as a barrier". (Sure, the latch keeps the wolves out, and stops them picking off the sheep – but it also keeps the sheep away from their only freshwater source, without which most of the sheep are going to die.) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | satvikpendem 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Or fix the latch? Or was this a sarcastic comment? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|