| ▲ | mirrormaster 19 hours ago |
| Isn't privacy a concern? How do consumers ensure that data is not going to captured in a future update without it being open source or having third party security audits? |
|
| ▲ | awestroke 19 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| That's a concern with all apps ever so idk what answer you're expecting |
| |
| ▲ | reconnecting 14 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Disagreed. It's not concerned with all apps, because most commercial applications have legal entities explaining how they use collected data. In this particular case, this is something called 'Refine', and it's not a legal entity, therefore, questioning its data privacy approach is fully legitimate. | |
| ▲ | mananaysiempre 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Except the open-source ones, or sandboxed[1] ones without any auto-update functionality (not sure if this app has any). [1] Loosely; I’d say not referencing any networking entrypoints or dlsym() also counts, as working around that would be very non-deniably malicious. | | |
| ▲ | reconnecting 14 hours ago | parent [-] | | Perhaps this type of software could be either open-source with full code accessibility, or proprietary but from a highly trustworthy entity responsible for privacy both legally and reputationally. Currently, both approaches are missing. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | reconnecting 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I also strongly believe that it’s a primary question when we talk about keyboard input. |