▲ | busymom0 a day ago | |||||||
If someone is running everyday like this, do they actually even need to lose weight? Aren't they already very fit? Also, testosterone also gets impacted by fatigue. Running is more fatiguing than lets say stationary biking or elliptical. So maybe try other forms of cardio to burn calories too instead of only running? | ||||||||
▲ | thewebguyd 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> If someone is running everyday like this, do they actually even need to lose weight? Aren't they already very fit? Not necessarily. There's a reason the saying is "You can't outrun a bad diet." Before I got my diet dialed in I was cycling every day, upwards of 10 miles a day with a couple 20 mile rides per week, and was still gaining weight because I ate like crap, and more importantly, still ate more than I was burning with all the exercise. The average American consumes 3,864 calories per day. A moderately active male might have a maintenance of ~2,647 calories, give or take a couple hundred. Just eating 500 calories per day over what you burn will lead to about a 1lb increase in weight per week. A zone 2 run might burn somewhere between 500-600 calories per hour, so its easy to see how quickly over eating can add up and at a point it becomes basically impossible to "run it off." There's other factors that play into it such as lean mass vs. fat, etc. but in general, you can be very active and still be overweight. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | mathieuh a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
You can eat like shit and do a lot of exercise and be overweight. I’m 90 kg at 180 cm. I ride my bike 450 km per week. A few weeks ago I did a 340 km, 3000 m elevation ride at 25.6 km/h and yesterday I did a 220 km ride at 27 km/h. Last week I burned 13,468 calories from cycling (this should be fairly accurate as I have a power meter). I would say I’m quite fit, I can obviously ride my bike further and faster than the vast majority of people but I am definitely overweight and look fat. | ||||||||
▲ | serial_dev a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
While I didn't run this much, I used to run 50 km / 30 miles a week. My "cardio" was good, but I didn't lose weight because all the running made me 1. extremely hungry 2. too tired to cook a proper meal, 3. have a convenient excuse to eat bad... "How could I not eat a second donut, I just ran 15k!" I was not "feeling fit", though, I believe I had low T, and I stayed relatively fat, which is not great for your organs, liver values, heart, etc. So even if you are able to run 50K a week, you may still be somewhat unhealthy due to poor diet and other factors, and some of them can be improved by losing weight... | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | amenghra a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I’m no expert, but you should be roughly as tired burning 200 kcal running vs walking vs biking. The difference will be how quickly you’ll burn those calories. | ||||||||
|