fork, task claude to remove all github dependence, build.

gpm 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

I did this locally to try it out :) Also stubbed out the telemetry and added jj support. "Personalizing" software like this is definitely one of LLMs superpowers.

I'm not particularly inclined to publish it because I don't want to associate myself with a project harvesting emails like this.

▲

BeetleB 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

> and added jj support

Please do the same for Aider :-)

https://github.com/Aider-AI/aider/issues/4250

	▲	gpm 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		Be the change you want to see! This is pretty close to a best case task for these models because it's a relatively direct "translation" of existing code. There's a big difference between "something actually ready for use" and "claude hacked sometime together with bubblegum and ducttape that works on my system" though - doing it properly will probably take a bit of work.

▲

janoelze 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

yes, i was just doing/thinking the same, it was an interesting experience to sculpt a somewhat complex codebase to my needs in minutes.

▲

hsbauauvhabzb 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Use a telemetry backed tool to remove telemetry from another telemetry backed tool?

▲

TeMPOraL 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

There's telemetry you consent to, and telemetry you don't. Just because I'm fine with a tool like Claude Code collecting some telemetry, doesn't mean I'm fine with a different party collecting telemetry - and the two products being used together doesn't change it. It's not naive, it's simply my right.

▲

janoelze 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

it came to mind first, you're free to use whatever flavour of LLM f̶l̶o̶a̶t̶s̶ ̶y̶o̶u̶r̶ ̶b̶o̶a̶t̶ vibes your code.

▲

hsbauauvhabzb 3 days ago | parent [-]

That doesn’t change the naïvety of the response.

	▲	collingreen a day ago \| parent [-]
		Your insult calling the commenter naive requires all telemetry from all sources to be the same. I disagree with who is naive in this exchange.