| ▲ | LucidLynx 4 days ago |
| What is the difference between Pangolin and NetBird, which is also a self-hosted and fully open-source solution? https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird |
|
| ▲ | dizhn 4 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| I believe netbird does not have all the features in the open source version. The one thing that was a show stopper for me was the SSO tax. |
|
| ▲ | resiros 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Would love to understand it better too. It looks like the use cases are similar but the tech is different. NetBird is an alternative to Tailscale that uses Wireguard under the hood while these seem to use Traefik under the hood. I am personally a user of NetBird and love it. The design of the UI is very similar though :) |
| |
| ▲ | fossorialowen 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Pangolin is "public ingress to private networks" and not a mesh VPN/network builder. As you say I think NetBird is an alternative to Tailscale and we are an alternative to Cloudflare tunnels, Ngrok, or Zscaler. It is more about exposing things publicly with authentication in the browser for people to access than about building a network for disparate devices to communicate. | | |
| ▲ | ghoshbishakh 3 days ago | parent [-] | | It is correct that pangolin is something like pinggy.io or cf tunnels as you mention. But those do not give such fine grained access control it seems - like a firewall checking identity and all. But definitely it is not a vpn or mesh network it seems. |
| |
| ▲ | rb666 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Pangolin also uses WireGuard and does not lock features behind a paywall. | | |
|
