You clearly did not read my suggestion to not respond until you'd gained a minimum amount of logical competence and emotional maturity.

> What are you, one of the LessWrong rationalists?

OK, so you don't comprehend the purpose of logic in society.

> emotions aren't inherently irrational

Factually incorrect. Emotions are irrational. This is objectively true. When you feel an emotion, a physically and spatially different part of your brain is being activated than when you think logically. You might be thinking that some emotions are justifiable - and some of them are. But that's not the point I was making, so that would be irrelevant - the point I was making is that you think that your emotional outbursts are equivalent to making a reasoned argument.

There's no point in continuing this. You appear to physically be unable to avoid responding emotionally, to the point where you don't even understand the difference between emotion and logic, or the purpose and necessity of thinking rationally in society - and you're proud that you don't.