▲ | Loughla a day ago | |
I don't think it really has a whole lot to do with socioeconomic hierarchy; I think that's just a happy accident. Old people vote. Old people vote in midterms and odd timed elections. Therefore, old people decide the candidates. Any politician would be smart to court them as a voting bloc. As for the benefits for the wealthy; that's just the same old bullshit in a new protectionist wrapper. Get my friends and family as much benefit as I can while I have the ability sort of thing. | ||
▲ | lotsofpulp a day ago | parent | next [-] | |
Old people voting in their own interests at the expense of young people is them trying to maintain their higher position in the socioeconomic hierarchy. There is a secondary component related to skin tone and ancestry as well. | ||
▲ | Dumblydorr a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Nice theory, however you’re believing people vote for their best interests, and the above comment believes they’re deluded by misinformation. I think both are occurring. Young white men went GOP, why is that? Anti vaxx leftists went with Kennedy, why is that? Why do anti-immigration and pro-economics claim the top two republican policy slots, when they’re firmly opposed in their effects on the economy? This is the contradictory trend of delusion and cult of personality. If the BBB just passed is an indication, I think overall we are more on the deluded side, most of these deluded non-rich white folks are more anti-immigrant than pro-economics. Of course I do not believe GOP economic policies are better than the alternative, I’m not the one who voted for that policy regime however! | ||
▲ | a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |
[deleted] |