It’s astonishing how here, in an ostensibly technical forum, the vast majority of comments are left by people who did not even skim the article. At least read through the informative comments left by those who did read it before giving your venerable opinion based on the information that was already in your head? I mean, isn’t the point of an article or paper to present new, novel information?

▲

RetpolineDrama a day ago | parent | next [-]

HN hasn't been a good place for technical discussion in at least 5-6 years, maybe longer.

X is much better for this kind of stuff these days (just follow the right people and stick to the following tab)

	▲	K0balt 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		X? But then you have to follow people, and inherently that backs you into a syncopation bubble. I value HN for the diversity of well considered opinions and ideas… but sadly that is dying.

▲

Henchman21 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

It’s the day before a holiday in the US. No one is thinking, we’re all just knee-jerk existing for another handful of hours and then… Then we engage in that once a year ritual of lighting up explosives and making a pilgrimage to the ER, where no one can afford proper treatment. /s

Happy 4th all!

(With apologies for the wildly off topic comment)

	▲	K0balt 15 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Good point. Cheerio.