except are you sure that's what it's doing? it could have been overloaded. you have to ask yourself that every time.

Doxin a day ago | parent | next [-]

Or you can assume it's implemented sanely. Yes if someone overrides $ and does something wildly wrong with it that'll get confusing. That's the fault of whoever wrote that code though, not of $ itself.

You can also overload +, imagine the mayhem if someone did something weird with that. should we ban overloading operators altogether?

	▲	throwawaymaths a day ago \| parent [-]
		> Or you can assume it's implemented sanely excuse me, have you spent any time in tech? people fucking love to do clever shit that gets people in trouble. using NULL as a not-pointer value signalling absence (without safeguards) is probably the most notorious -- but at least useful, but if you want to get brain meltingly annoying and pervasive, we dont have to stray too far from the idea of operator overloading; c++'s << operator can just go to hell.

▲

1980phipsi a day ago | parent | prev [-]

I've looked at a lot of D code, and I can't recall it ever being misused.