▲ | Spivak 2 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As well as those standups which are just micro-presentations where each person talks in turn about their respective card but there's no discussion. The teams that moved to async standups where they just post status updates in Slack and amigo only when needed seem happier. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | nottorp a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The worst part about the standup ritual is that no one talks outside standups. With async text communication channels you'll post when an issue shows up. With the standups you'll wait until the next standup and maybe forget the details until then, or forget about the issue entirely and that will lead to technical debt. > when an issue shows up Advanced usage: post proactively before you reach the task/issue. This way people have time to comment on it and when you do get to it it's been clear what to do for 1-2 days. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | riffraff a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text-only stand-ups also have a tendency to devolve into just posting text into the void than nobody reads, so you may as well move to the even simpler "I need to discuss" flags which reduces communication even more. But then some people don't like that. I am afraid there's no perfect solution, and it just boils down to people's preferences and the skills of people involved. And the chemistry between them. I've been in teams which flip flopped over time between "communication worsened" and "wasting everyone's time". Being remote for 15+ years I enjoy the "convivial" side of stand-ups but I hate when they devolve into rote status reports. |