▲ | eddythompson80 2 days ago | |||||||||||||
That's exactly the brand of nonesense that is sold to people there as "progressive" and "anti-colonialism" while infact it's just pure nonesense. Of course every culture/society had to have come from some previous place/culture/society that changed over time due to an incredibly long and complex set of circumstances. The story one must believe to accept your view is that at a flick of the wrist, humans turned from Cave Men to some vague list of "root societies/civilizations" people moved around. Understanding how that movement happened 15 thousands years ago won't make the jews take over Egypt I promise. | ||||||||||||||
▲ | jjtheblunt 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
i think you accidentally worded this in a way you might not have meant. you said a culture (singular) had to have come from another culture (singular), missing the possibility of blending, as worded. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
▲ | prmph 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
I think you misunderstand my point. You are kind of confirming my point. What I am saying is that for some reason, this finding somewhere else is not applied consistently. Either we should keep finding the somewhere else for all cultures for as far back as we can, or else stop with this nonsense that just because a culture has some roots from elsewhere, so therefore it cannot have made innovations by itself beyond its supposed origins. | ||||||||||||||
|