> (Incentive to just rotate the key and brick all the devices rather than fix the problem, most likely.

But that at least turns it into something customers will notice. And companies already have existing incentives for dealing with that.

▲

bigiain 2 days ago | parent [-]

At that stage you just rotate the company name or branding...

▲

eru 2 days ago | parent [-]

Sure. But then you cannot benefit from building up a good reputation and charge people extra for it.

(There's a reason Apple can charge crazy markups.)

▲

bigiain 21 hours ago | parent [-]

Had you ever heard of IKKO before this? I hadn't, and I'm at least adjacent to the hifi and audio nerd crowd.

Apple have a reputation and brand that allows them to charge premium prices.

IKKO seems, at least to me, to be effectively a disposable brand. If their reputation goes bad, their only reals costs are setting up a new website/AliExpress Store/Amazon seller account.

	▲	eru 18 hours ago \| parent [-]
		To expand on what I was trying to say: Yes, you can run with disposable brands. It's a perfectly viable business strategy in many cases. However: if you do that you are missing out on the benefits of building a good reputation. Even in the cases, where your product _is_ actually good. So another perfectly valid business strategy is to build a longer lasting brand. Like Apple has done. (Or countless other companies.) In most markets we see both kinds of strategies at play. As a customer, you can usually decide which kind of strategy you give your money to.