▲ | plorntus 2 days ago | |
To be honest the responses sounded copy and pasted straight from ChatGPT, it seemed like there was fake feigned interest into their non-existent youtube channel. > Overall simple security design flaws but it's good to see a company that cares to fix them, even if they didn't take security seriously from the start I don't think that should give anyone a free pass though. It was such a simple flaw that realistically speaking they shouldn't ever be trusted again. If it had been a non-obvious flaw that required going through lots of hoops then fair enough but they straight up had zero authentication. That isn't a 'flaw' you need an external researcher to tell you about. I personally believe companies should not be praised for responding to such a blatant disregard for quality, standards, privacy and security. No matter where they are from. |