Sure, that can be done together with the scanning.

fc417fc802 16 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It can't, because we don't know what yet unknown questions we might want to ask in the future or what yet uninvented technology might come to exist. Add a limited budget and storage space and it becomes clear why the preference is often not to excavate but instead to restrict public access to the site and leave things in the ground.

	▲	BurningFrog 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		We can measure impurities and isotopes extremely well, which is what the post I responded to mentioned. This is very mature technology. You're right that we don't know what new branches of science might be developed that could produce new insights from old artifacts. But remember the situation. My idea makes it possible to record and analyze ancient finds that currently just disappear. It only gets us 99% of what we want, but in the current system we get 0%. https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Nirvana...

▲

rectang 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Thank goodness you weren't in charge of the Herculanum scrolls.

	▲	pbhjpbhj 10 hours ago \| parent [-]
		We can produce 3D scans of the gold, do mass spectroscopy. Do you feel that vikings somehow embedded secrets in their coin? Scrolls have writing on, if we can't yet read them we'd know that there was something else to discover (known unknowns) and clearly wouldn't dispose of them. Of course the Vikings might have embedded secret extraterrestrial technologies in their coins, but I'd take the bet that they haven't. The downthread comment about leaving things in the ground is right though -- it was, and is imo, the right thing to do.